![]() You should DEFINITELY check out more of him on YT (Tanz der Vampire, The Beauty and the Beast, The Red Shoes, CATS, his solo works, etc.)!!! The part of Munkustrap in CATS used to be very tiny, but it was changed specificially for him, to have more time on stage and it was kept that way. his weird style he often used as a Phantom. Ugly? Oooookay, I've never heard anyone say that D But that's your opinion, I consider many men "ugly" who are said to look good.^^ well, he played the Phantom for long time, I think the actors switched. ![]() Well, in London it was Michael Crawford (they switched roles) and later. I don't hate 2004, but it's one of the weakest productions of all time! Also, his singing was horrible, his acting was boring. At least not in a open-shirted, cute (and not at all deformed!) faced, smoky singing way. That's even worse! Because the Phantom is NOT hot. I see that many women are attracted to him, I think he's boring and rather wannabe-hot. Christine has to sound experienced at a young age! While she's ncie for today's pop standart, she would have never been accepted in an opera! Also, Patrick Wilson was a little boring, but a decent Raoul. And sounded old, but still unexperienced. A seventeen year old could play a twentysomething if she looks like at least her age. She sounds a lot older than she is, while she looks even younger than she is. Emmy has a distinctive, nice voice, but it's not at all operatic, nor is it pure. But Christine is a bright, fantastic young opera singer. She IS (or was in 2004) a doe-eyed teenage pop singer. Sarah: Emmy Rossum is a pretty girl and quite a good actress and singer, but she appeared to be a doe-eyed teenage pop singer. Everyone has own opinions! And I mainly agree with you D
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |